Karna, his wives and children

Karna had two wives and 10 sons. Nine of them died in the Mahabharata war.

Vrishali

She was Karna's first wife -- a sister of Duryodhana's Sarathi Satyasena.

Karna's foster father Adhiratha was  was so impressed with her steadfast character and demeanour that he wanted his son to marry her. Vrishali committed Sati after Karna was killed during the war. They had eight sons

  • Vrishasena: The eldest son of Karna. Arjun killed him to avenge Abhimanyu. He declared that 'Karna had killed my son when I was not there, but I will kill his son in front of him'. Arjun fulfilled his vow.
  • Sushena: Nakula killed him. 
  • Bhanusen: Nakula killed him.
  • Satyasen: Nakula killed him.
  • Prasenjit: Satyiki killed him.
  • Satyasandh: Arjuna killed him.
  • Shatrunjaya: Arjuna killed him.
  • Vrishketu: Karna’s only son to survive the war as he did not take part in the Mahabharata war. 
    Vrikshketu was married to the daughter of some king named Yavanaath. Pandavas adopted him as their son after the war. Arjuna trained him in archery and Bhim in mace fight. After the war, he clashed with Babhruvahana, the son Arjuna and Chitrangada, and was almost fatally wounded. Arjuna, fighting with him, also got near-fatal wounds. But Arjuna's other wife, Ulupi of the Naga tribe saved them with Naagamni.

    Supriya

    She was Karna's second wife -- a friend of Duryodhana's wife Bhanumati. They had two sons

    • Banasena: Bhim killed him on the 16th day of the war
    • Dvipata: Arjuna killed him.

    Some other Mahabharata traditions, in regional versions, mentions more wives of Karna. They had been identified as  Padmavati, Uruvi, and Rituvati.

    The beauty of English

     A must 'check them out' item for all English lovers...

    Sesquipedalian Expressions! It's fun.  Try to guess before scrolling! 


    1. Scintillate, scintillate asteroid minute. 


    Twinkle, twinkle little star.


    2. Members of an avian species of identical plumage congregate.


    Birds of a feather flock together


    3. Surveillance should precede saltation.


    Look before you leap


    4. It is fruitless to become lachrymose over precipitately departed lactose fluid.


    Don't cry over spilled milk


    5. Freedom from encrustation of grime is contiguous to divinity.


    Cleanliness is next to godliness


    6. The stylus is more potent than the claymore.


    The pen is mightier than the sword


    7. It is fruitless to attempt to indoctrinate a superannuated canine with innovative maneuvre.


    You can't teach an old dog new tricks


    8. Eschew the implement of correction and vitiate the scion.


    Spare the rod and spoil the child


    9. The temperature of aqueous content of an unremittingly ogled saucepan does not reach 212 fahrenheit.


    A watched pot never boils


    10. Neophyte's serendipity.


    Beginner's luck


    11. Male cadavers are incapable of yielding any testimony.


    Dead men don't talk


    12. Individuals who make their abode in vitreous edifices would be advised to refrain from catapulting petrous projectiles.


    People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones


    13. All articles that coruscate with resplendence are not truly auriferous.


    All that glitters is not gold


    14. Where there are visible vapors having their province in ignited carbonaceous material there is conflagration.


    Where there's smoke there's fire


    15. Sorting on the part of mendicants must be interdicted.


    Beggers can't be choosers


    16. A plethora of individuals with expertise in culinary techniques dilapidates the potable concoction produced by steeping comestibles.


    Too many cooks spoil the broth


    17. Exclusive dedication to necessary chores without interludes of hedonistic diversion renders John a hebephrenic fellow.


    All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy


    18. A revolving lathic conglomerate accumulates no diminutive glaucous syrophytic plants.


    A rolling stone gathers no moss


    19. The person with the ultimate cachinnation possesses, thereby, the optimal cachinnation.


    He who laughs last, laughs best


    20. Missiles of ligneous or petrous consistency have the potential of fracturing my osseous structure but appellations will eternally be benign.


    Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me


    21. Pulchritude possesses solely cutaneous profundity.


    Beauty is only skin deep


    22. You are cordially invited to the theological place of  eternal punishment.


     GO TO HELL!

    Demonetisation verdict in simple points

    This is from/based on the Supreme Court Observer. 

    Demonetisation of 86% of the currency in circulation in 2016 by the Narendra Modi government got the 'legally valid' nod from the Supreme Court.


    The Supreme Court upheld the Union’s 2016-demonetisation move in a 4:1 majority decision on January 2. 

    Justice BR Gavai authored the majority judgment on behalf of Justices Abdul Nazeer, AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian. 

    Justice BV Nagarathna dissented. 

    The majority judgement

    1. The Union has the authority to execute a scheme such as demonetisation. The court ‘cannot supplant the wisdom of the executive by a judicial review of its decision’. 

    2. The Union can demonetise currency notes of all denominations through a notification. Section 26(2) of the Reserve Bank Of India Act 1934, allows the Union to declare any series of banknotes as invalid tender, if recommended by the Central Board of the Reserve Bank. The majority interpreted ‘any’ series of bank notes widely as ‘all’ series of bank notes, expanding the scope of the Union’s powers.

    3. The Union had consulted with the RBI before carrying out the exercise, as stipulated in the RBI Act. This fulfilled the necessary safeguards to introduce the scheme.

    4. The demonetisation scheme was introduced to tackle crucial objectives such as counterfeit currency, black money and terror funding. These objectives justify the introduction of the scheme. Whether the objectives were met or not is irrelevant to decide its lawfulness. 

    Dissenting opinion

    1. The demonetisation challenges involved an interpretation of the powers of the Union and the RBI under the RBI Act. This brought the case squarely under the court’s powers of judicial review.

    2. The Union has unrestricted power to demonetise all series of all currency notes. However, the RBI Act does not give the Union this power. A separate legislation must be enacted to allow this manner of demonetisation.

    3. The the entire exercise of the Union consulting with the RBI was carried out within 24 hours. This showed the RBI did not duly apply its mind before the demonetisation exercise was carried out. 

    4. The 2016-demonetisation exercise was unlawful purely on legal grounds despite the ‘noble objectives’ of the scheme.

    Key issues before SC

    • Did the demonetisation scheme abide by the provisions of the RBI Act, 1934? 
    Majority: yes

    • Did the limits on withdrawing cash violate the Rights to Equality and Livelihood?
    • Majority: no
    • Was the scheme implemented in an unreasonable manner that violated the Rights to Equality and Livelihood?
    • Majority: no
    • To what extent can the SC review a scheme relating to the fiscal and economic policy of the government?
    • Majority: it can't.

    A missed history in Rishi Sunak's defeat

    Rishi Sunak would have been the 6th Indian origin head of state. But it was not to be. Here’s how it happened in the UK:

    • Controversial, bold and maverick Boris Johnson resigned as the Conservative Party leader and the UK prime minister when Mahendra Singh Dhoni turned 41 — July 7. It was not a call of conscience but a decision thrust upon him, practically. His cabinet had faced a string of resignations, beginning with Sunak.  Alleged scandals were making news waves — allegations of sexual misconduct against a lawmaker, and indictment for holding parties while the nation was in the Covid-19 lockdown. 

    • A PM’s resignation in the UK does not necessarily mean a general election. There is another intense democratic process — of holding an election in the ruling party structure to decide who could lead the country. 

    • The UK’s oldest political party, the Conservative Party, held that election in a true sense — unlike its Indian counterpart. In that election, Indian origin leader Sunak tasted defeat, with some experts saying that the non-Indian origin sub-continental members opposed him.

    • Who was the PM all this while? Johnson. And, he did not try to do any ‘operation’ to stay in power after September 6, as had been scheduled unofficially.

    • How did they do it? Their system requires a Conservative Party MP to be nominated by at least 20 fellow MPs to be eligible to run the race to the prime minister’s chair. 

    • In the first stage, MPs vote in a series of secret ballots — to eliminate the candidate with the lowest votes. They repeat the process until they have only two PM contenders.

    • In the first stage, eight challengers were chosen. You want names? It’s boring but here they are — former finance minister Rishi Sunak, foreign secretary Liz Truss, junior trade minister Penny Mordaunt, former equalities minister Kemi Badenoch, attorney general Suella Braverman, former health secretary Jeremy Hunt, foreign affairs Committee chairman Tom Tugendhat, and chancellor Nadhim Zahawi.

    • And as you know, Truss and Sunak stayed the course when secret voting ended. At 42, Sunak was an Indian favourite not because he was an MP from Richmond, Yorkshire, from where Sachin Tendular played county cricket in a historical sporting turn but because of his Indian connection — and for being the son-in-law of India’s favourite IT hero Narayan Murthy. Had he defeated Truss, Sunak would have become the first person of colour — as they call it in the white race world — to become the UK prime minister.

    • A little older than Sunak, 46-year-old Truss — born only a month after Indira Gandhi brought India under her National Emergency — was the foreign policy portfolio holder in Johnson’s cabinet. Despite being younger than Rahul Gandhi, the de facto leader of India’s GOP, she is a veteran in handling government roles, having worked under UK prime ministers David Cameron and Theresa May before Johnson.

    • In the final stage of election, all the card holders of the Conservative Party — also called Tories; I don’t know much about their origin or why they are called what they are called but I know that they were the supporters of British colonialism, with their origin lying in the British civil war when their guiding philosophy was “God, Queen, and Country” to keep the English traditional culture alive and dominating — vote to elect their leader. This is where Truss defeated Sunak by over 20,000 votes. 

    • I was surprised by their numbers. Why? Because the UK has a population of less than 7 crore, and its GOP declares a victory margin that is two times more than the total number of voters in India’s GOP when they elect their president next month. And unlike the UK, Indian GOP voters have their tenures expired.

    • When the ruling party voters have decided, the Crown, currently the Queen, completes the formality of accepting the resignation of the resigned and accepting the offer/granting permission to the next (Truss) to form the Queen’s next government. By the way, while we name an Indian government after the prime minister, technically the PM runs the President’s government. If you don’t believe me, tune in to the next joint session of Parliament when incumbent Draupadi Murmu addresses it. She will say, “Meri Sarkaar…”

    Why 2 Noida towers were bombed down on Supreme Court orders


    Could there have been any other end to Noida twin towers? An exemplary deterrent penalty on builders and speedier pace of justice to catch their government collaborators in committing illegality of this height? After all, why bring down two housing towers if there's no architectural flaws threatening human lives? Because its environmental impact may not be measured so easily. And, it was the violation of the green belt laws that led to rigging the two towers with 3,700 kg of explosives.


    The project


    It is in Noida Sector 93A's GH-04. Once a famed builder Supertech built a massive housing society, building two additional towers than it was legally permitted to build. These two towers — 16 and 17 — lie in the green belt. 


    The storeys lived as a testimony to manipulation by money-merchants, corruption by unscrupulous officers, indifference of the supposed-to-be scrupulous and pedestrian treatment of the cattle class aam aadmi, who is by the way the biggest voter for any government or political party.


    This story began in 2004. On November 23, 2004, Supertech was allotted 48,263 square metre land by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, known as Noida in abbreviated form, for building a residential complex, Emrald Court. 


    As per the New Okhla Industrial Development Area Building Regulations and Directions 1986, the Authority approved the building plan for the construction of 14 storeys on June 20, 2005.


    Supertech was originally given approval to build a total of 14 towers, each with ground+plus+nine (10) storeys at a capping height of 37 metres


    A year later, on June 21, 2006, the Authority allotted 6,556.51 square metre land to Supertech under the same conditions. 


    The project was revised three times — 2006, 2009 and 2012— increasing the number of floors and towers. By the time the third revison came for 8nclusion of the tallest towers, now bombed to the ground, the original plan had been modified to accommodate 15 towers of 14 storeys. The two new towers got approval for 40 towers each. Both these towers remained incomplete — one with 29 and the other with 32 storeys.


    Too FAR in law


    Every builder is given a Floor Area Ratio (FAR). During 2004-06, Supertech was given 1.5 FAR but as per rules, only a new allottee can be given 2 to 2.75 FAR.


    The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) was purchased twice for a total of Rs 23 crore — Rs 15 crore and Rs 8 crore.


    FAR is legally binding but practically what happens is once a builder pays the money, the government officials are not there to bother you. 


    In Supertech's case, the FAR increased by 33% on second project revision in 2009 — from 1.5 to 1.995.


    And on October 25, 2011, Supertech secured another expansion FAR for Rs 15 crore from 1.995 to 2.75. 


    A charge was that Supertech got FAR increased by bribing the officials.


    If you were a homebuyer 


    Supertech presented a different Emerald Court plan to homebuyers in November 2009. It presented to them a plan housing complex plan that had 14 towers, each of 25 storeys (ground included) and a T 16 — a shopping complex (ground plus structure). The height was to reach up to 73 metres. A clear rejection of what had been legally approved.


    Emerald Court dragged to court


    After 2012-revison that included 40-floor towers — Apex and Ceyane, which, Supertech claimed, met the Noida construction requirements of 2010. The problem was that the Residents’ Welfare Association (RWA) was not convinced. It moved to the Allahabad High Court before the end of 2012. It petitioned the high court that Supertech violated  by the UP Apartment Owners Act, 2010 by constructing the Twin Towers.


    The Twin Towers occupied an area designated for a garden in the original brochure given by Supertech. The petitioner told the court that the additional buildings, approval for which was allegedly taken through bribes, were separated by less than 16 metres, another violation of law.


    After hearing argents from both sides, the Allahabad High Court ordered in 2014 the demolition of the Twin Towers. It also directed Supertech to return homebuyers their money with an interest of 14%. The high court ordered to seal the Twin Towers.


    However, as it came out during the Supreme Court hearing, the construction continued despite the high court's seal order. 


    In August 2021, the Supreme Court upheld the high court judgement. And instead of keeping the buildings sealed, it ordered them demolished.


    In February this year, the Noida informed the Supreme Court that demolition process was underway and that it would be completed by August 22. Later, an extension of a week was given by the Supreme Court, with an additional buffer period of a week if the demolition process got disrupted by weather conditions.


    Fixing responsibility


    Following the Supreme Court order, the Yogi Adityanath government set up a special investigation team (SIT) in September 2021. The SIT submitted its report in October 2021, finding involvement of 26 officials. The government suspended three. 



    Could it have been avoided?


    Possibly, yes had Supertech adhered to the rules and stayed honest in its business. But this could be too much to ask. If a business were to be honest wouldn't the proprietors prefer to do a government or a private sector job! They come into business to make profit, big money. In this hot pursuit of money, the rule of law that is meant to protect the aam aadmi and aurat is twisted or blinded. 


    Another way to avoid it was change of rules. Had the Noida wanted it could have changed the land use rules and allowed the construction legally. Environmental laws could have been meandered to legalise the illegality. 


    But even this didn't happen. And Noida Twin Towers, taller than Delhi's Qutub Minar, met their premature demise.


    In nutshell, Supertech violated the law, bribed officials, manipulated the buyers flouted environmental laws (remember environment assessment requirements of 2005-06?) and issued occupancy certificates without structural safety and environmental assessment studies. 


    For those interested in politics, a coincidence: Supertech project got began in 2004 after the Congress-led UPA government came to power at the Centre and its fate sealed in 2014 after the Modi government came to power at the Centre. This is not to suggest that there's a connection between the two events.


    I was tempted to compile the names of officials found to be involved in the Supertech illegality but curbed the urge. It's system that's is ailing not the individuals who keep the system in motion as its part.

    Who are Santhals, the community Draupadi Murmu belongs to?


    Draupadi Murmu/Twitter


    Santhal, also spelt as Santal, literally means a calm, peaceful man. Santha means calm, and ala means man in the Santhali (also spelt as Santali) language. 


    Santhals are the third largest scheduled tribe community in India after Gonds and Bhils. The Santhali population is mostly distributed in Jharkhand, Odisha and West Bengal.


    The BJP’s presidential election candidate Draupadi Murmu’s home district, Mayurbhanj, is one of the districts having dense concentration of the Santhali people. 


    The Odisha government’s website for Bhubaneswar-based Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute (SCSTRTI) has amazing details on the lives of the Santhali people, tracing their life from prehistoric times.


    The Santhals were a nomadic stock before they chose to settle in the Chotanagpur plateau. By the end of the 18th century, they had concentrated in the Santhal Parganas of Jharkhand (earlier Bihar). From there, they migrated to Odisha and West Bengal. 


    The tribal communities, outside the Northeast, generally have lower levels of literacy but the Santhals have higher – a result of a pro-school education awareness since at least the 1960s – literacy rate compared to other tribes in Odisha, Jharkhand and West Bengal. Many of the community have entered the creamy layer of the Indian society. 


    For example, Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren is a Santhal. The incumbent Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAGI) Girsh Chandra Murmu, who was the first Lt Governor of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, is also a Santhal. 


    The current Union Jal Shakti Minister Biseswar Tudu – the Lok Sabha MP from Draupadi Murmu’s home district Mayurbhanj – is from the Santhal community. Some news reports quoted their community leaders terming the nomination of Draupadi Murmu as the ruling party’s presidential election candidate as “a golden era for Santhals” in the country.


    Despite their social uplift, the Santhals are usually connected to their roots. They are nature worshippers and could be seen paying obeisance at Jaher (sacred groves) in their villages. 


    Most Santhals are agriculturists, depending on their farmlands or forests. 


    Their homes, called Olah, have a particular three-colour pattern on the outer walls. The bottom portion is painted with black soil, the middle with white and the upper with red. 


    Their tribal language is called Santhali, which is written in a script called Ol chiki, developed by Santhal scholar Pandit Raghunath Murmu. Santhali written in OI-Chiki script is recognised as one of the scheduled languages in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution.

    मज़ाक में बेबुनियाद सवाल




    कोई मुझे बताएगा कि

    जो लोग कही के नही रहते,

    वो कहाँ रहते है?

    xxxxxxxxxx

    किसी को पता है कि

    ये दिल पर रखने वाला पत्थर कहाँ मिलता है?

    और, कितने किलो का लेना होता है?

    xxxxxxxxx

    एक बात बताओ जिनकी दाल नहीं गलती

    वो क्या सब्ज़ी बना सकते हैं?

    xxxxxxxx

    किसी को पता है कि

    पाप को घड़े में ही क्यूँ भरते हैं?

    ठंडा रहता है क्या?

    xxxxxxx

    किसी के ज़ख़्म पर नमक छिड़कना है।

    कौन-सा सही रहेगा?

    टाटा या पतंजलि?

    (पुराने लैपटॉप के नोट्स में मिला)


    5 numbers linked to ideal heart health