The BBC interview of the outgoing RBI
governor Raghuram Rajan and his comments about the prime minister betrays the
bitter relation between the two top functionaries of governance. Rajan has
never shied away from expressing his displeasure at the government’s policies.
He has been a very political RBI governor without having affiliation to any
political outfit.
In his latest interview with the BBC,
Rajan refused to answer a rapid fire question saying “Whatever answer I give
will be problematic, so I will just pass.” This shows his utter dislike for the
incumbent government. With this statement Rajan may go out at a bold and upfront
RBI governor but history may consider him a misfit RBI governor.
If one goes by the role and functions of
the RBI as envisaged in its establishment in 1935 and nationalization in 1949,
she would not imagine a political RBI. And, this is where Rajan looks a misfit
for the role. He remains the academician that he has been for long.
The Banking Regulation Act 1949 and the
RBI Act 1953 has given the RBI the power to regulate the banking system. The website of the RBI lays down
the following functions of the central bank in India:
Monetary Authority:
• Formulation,
implementation and monitoring of the monetary policy.
• Objective:
maintaining price stability and ensuring adequate flow of credit to productive
sectors.
Regulator and
supervisor of the financial system:
• Prescribing broad
parameters of banking operations
• Objective:
maintain public confidence in the system, protect depositors' interest and
provide cost-effective banking services to the public.
Manager of Foreign
Exchange:
• Managing foreign
exchange as mandated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
• Objective: to
facilitate external trade and payment and promote orderly development and
maintenance of foreign exchange market in India.
Issuer of currency:
• The RBI issues
and exchanges or destroys currency and coins not fit for circulation.
• Objective: to
give the public adequate quantity of supplies of currency notes and coins and
in good quality.
Developmental role:
• Performs a wide
range of promotional functions to support national objectives.
Related Functions:
• Banker to the
Government: performs merchant banking function for the central and the state
governments; also acts as their banker.
• Banker to banks:
maintains banking accounts of all scheduled banks.
Clearly, the RBI’s defined role is
to be the support system of the government of the day. But, with all academic
brilliance, Rajan has failed to implement the laid out mandate. Perhaps, his
academic brilliance, his astute understanding of the economy forced him to run a
somewhat parallel fiscal policy for the country. (Recall his inflation loaded
views on interest rates- not talking of merit, just the mandated role and what
Rajan actually did).
Rajan could not become the next Manmohan Singh, who during
his governorship, with all understanding of the then changing world, crumbling
cold age economy proved an able support system of the Indira Gandhi government.
And, ironically it was Manmohan Singh who honoured a commitment by appointing
Rajan the RBI governor. But, it seems Rajan did not learn the art of playing
his role according the chair from one of the finest prime ministers of India,
that Manmohan Singh was.
It looks bitter that Rajan was not given
another term by the Modi government. But, it may actually turn out to be
better. Any government under parliamentary form like ours deserves a supporting
central bank. An adverse central bank would deviate, deflect and distort
government’s policies. It has been happening in India leading a state of policy
confusion. India can hardly afford to bear policy confusion as a follow up of
policy paralysis.
PS: The author is not suggesting that BJP's insinuating machine (SS) was right in launching a tirade against Rajan.
Rajan is India's loss and Chicago University's gain. Modi government should have handled him with care.
ReplyDeleteGaurav in that sense it was actually supposed to be the Chicago University's loss and India's gain. But, despite his economics resume, nothing much happened for India.
DeleteAny specific asks from Rajan Prabhash?
DeleteMe? Nothing. I just wanted to state how the arrangement was expected to work as per the system.
DeleteRaghuram Rajan did the best thing by moving on. This government did not deserve an RBI governor like Rajan.
ReplyDeleteWhen you say this government, it constitutionally reflects the will of the most major wish of the nation. And, such large volume of population should not be treated with disdain.
DeleteThe RBI is there to support and supplement the government. I agree with the author that Rajan did not do well for the continuance of economic policies.
ReplyDeleteIn a sense Sakshi, you are right. But, I feel that the RBI is not there to supplement the government. The RBI's mandate looks more to act in conformity of the policies of the government for betterment of the economic well being of the country.
DeleteI agree Rajan's moving out is not sad but the real question is what solace will the new change bring in?
ReplyDeleteI agree Rajan's moving out is not sad but the real question is what solace will the new change bring in?
ReplyDelete