I wrote this piece long back in April 2006. Surprisingly, my opinion on government's reservation policy has not changed much. I am reproducing the article here. It is a immature in construction, but I feel it is good enough for my blog.
Thanks to the new amendment in the article 15 of the Constitution the reservation policy is back in debate. The Constitution of India provides for the laws being made for the uplift and sound development of the weaker sections of society. The founding fathers of the Constitution carved out such provisions to correct the historical wrong/injustice done to a segment of our society, generally clubbed as Dalits, in modern day politics. The governments in the Independent India have on record tried to achieve what the Constitution makers thought would help developing a balanced and equality based society of India. Needless to say that something has definitely gone wrong in the process else India would have succeeded in developing a dream society of its own.
It would be insane to think that the Constitution makers were wrong in intent or logic. They adequately identified a problem of grave concern and provided for a constitutional solution hoping that fifteen years would be ample time to do away with the economic-social injustice, and that the government would do enough to realize this constitutional ideal. But, the spirit of framing a constitution and that of running a government are two different things. One treads in the realms of idealism whereas the other in the sphere of pragmatism. Running a government is driven for sure by ambition (previously called lust), for power, status, popularity et al.
The result is, another constitutional amendment providing for the admission into IIMs and IITs. This clearly goes against the spirit of the Constitution, as getting admission into IIMs and IITs has nothing to do with the basic needs of life and livelihood what was the primary concern of the Constitution makers. Moreover, one who has to fight for his daily meals does not and can not think of getting into these premier institutions. Obviously this move of the UPA government has something else in its intent, may be due to upcoming elections in the states or god knows what
So to say that government in India has failed the idea of governance as envisaged in the Constitution would not amount to committing a crime. For, fifty-six years (in 2006) are not spent in a day. Shortage of time has never been a problem for India's political community but the will.
The problem warrants a wider debate and deeper analysis. In the first place the meaning of reservation/quota needs to be understood. Literally it implies giving opportunities to a defined class of citizens or public. But, practically it means preferring less competent people to more competent ones for a particular purpose. Such policy does not augur well for a developing country in modern age especially if it is India.
The argument that by giving reservation to the underprivileged segment of society, it can be brought at par with rest of the society does not hold much water. The sense that we get from the working at medical and engineering colleges or even the government departments does not toe the political line of pro-quota policy. It is commonly said that the people getting jobs through reservation do not perform as well as others. That they do not meet the minimum qualifying standards for the jobs at hand and the reason for this quality gap does not lie in their birth but in the process of their qualitative strengthening, which the quota policy doesn't focus on.
The reservation policy has been here for quite long now and it has not yielded what was expected of it. The main problem is that it is caste based. The benefits of the quota have gone overwhelmingly to the better-off people among the reservation category castes. So, the policy has always missed the real target and it's been known to all (the stakeholders). Nevertheless the rules and laws have kept coming up on the same line and the present one is just an addition to the list.
The son of a marginal farmer or a farm-labourer in a remote village without doubt is not going to draw any benefit from quota in IIMs and IITs as he/she would not be able to fill-in the application form and meet the traveling cost for appearing even in the written examination and group- discussion thereof. So, who is the real target of such an amendment is hard to fantasize even.
This move is certainly going to aggravate the problem of unemployment among the educated youth. The unemployed educated people are more susceptible to anti-social activities. All the government and other reports suggest that the unemployed muslim youth fall easy prey to the propaganda of jehad. In fact, in Jammu and Kashmir it is a popular perception that getting into the rank and file of terrorism draws more money than getting into the all-elusive jobs. The government definitely should have looked at this angle too.
The call of the hour therefore is not to implement the amendment in haste. The issue should be looked in wider perspectives. The problems being faced by the weaker sections must be looked at with great care and in such a manner that it does not give rise to another problem in our society
The weaker sections of our society first need to be clearly defined and identified if the government's intent is to improve their lot and not to gain some hidden insane benefits only. Caste can no longer be taken as a basis for any such demarcation. No caste is weak or strong today, it's the position of an individual that is weaker or stronger. The lopsided reservation policy has only corroborated this. The people from the weaker sections must be at first ensured jobs at their own places. Their children must be ensured a healthy life and a healthy school education. Other embedded aspects are the population size and the growth rate of population among the weaker sections. The people sensitized to understand the relation between the size of population and the rate of population growth on one hand and jobs, poverty, health and effectiveness of governmental measures on the other. Let's hope the government would show enough courage and sense to provide the " governance with real human face".
Thanks to the new amendment in the article 15 of the Constitution the reservation policy is back in debate. The Constitution of India provides for the laws being made for the uplift and sound development of the weaker sections of society. The founding fathers of the Constitution carved out such provisions to correct the historical wrong/injustice done to a segment of our society, generally clubbed as Dalits, in modern day politics. The governments in the Independent India have on record tried to achieve what the Constitution makers thought would help developing a balanced and equality based society of India. Needless to say that something has definitely gone wrong in the process else India would have succeeded in developing a dream society of its own.
It would be insane to think that the Constitution makers were wrong in intent or logic. They adequately identified a problem of grave concern and provided for a constitutional solution hoping that fifteen years would be ample time to do away with the economic-social injustice, and that the government would do enough to realize this constitutional ideal. But, the spirit of framing a constitution and that of running a government are two different things. One treads in the realms of idealism whereas the other in the sphere of pragmatism. Running a government is driven for sure by ambition (previously called lust), for power, status, popularity et al.
The result is, another constitutional amendment providing for the admission into IIMs and IITs. This clearly goes against the spirit of the Constitution, as getting admission into IIMs and IITs has nothing to do with the basic needs of life and livelihood what was the primary concern of the Constitution makers. Moreover, one who has to fight for his daily meals does not and can not think of getting into these premier institutions. Obviously this move of the UPA government has something else in its intent, may be due to upcoming elections in the states or god knows what
So to say that government in India has failed the idea of governance as envisaged in the Constitution would not amount to committing a crime. For, fifty-six years (in 2006) are not spent in a day. Shortage of time has never been a problem for India's political community but the will.
The problem warrants a wider debate and deeper analysis. In the first place the meaning of reservation/quota needs to be understood. Literally it implies giving opportunities to a defined class of citizens or public. But, practically it means preferring less competent people to more competent ones for a particular purpose. Such policy does not augur well for a developing country in modern age especially if it is India.
The argument that by giving reservation to the underprivileged segment of society, it can be brought at par with rest of the society does not hold much water. The sense that we get from the working at medical and engineering colleges or even the government departments does not toe the political line of pro-quota policy. It is commonly said that the people getting jobs through reservation do not perform as well as others. That they do not meet the minimum qualifying standards for the jobs at hand and the reason for this quality gap does not lie in their birth but in the process of their qualitative strengthening, which the quota policy doesn't focus on.
The reservation policy has been here for quite long now and it has not yielded what was expected of it. The main problem is that it is caste based. The benefits of the quota have gone overwhelmingly to the better-off people among the reservation category castes. So, the policy has always missed the real target and it's been known to all (the stakeholders). Nevertheless the rules and laws have kept coming up on the same line and the present one is just an addition to the list.
The son of a marginal farmer or a farm-labourer in a remote village without doubt is not going to draw any benefit from quota in IIMs and IITs as he/she would not be able to fill-in the application form and meet the traveling cost for appearing even in the written examination and group- discussion thereof. So, who is the real target of such an amendment is hard to fantasize even.
This move is certainly going to aggravate the problem of unemployment among the educated youth. The unemployed educated people are more susceptible to anti-social activities. All the government and other reports suggest that the unemployed muslim youth fall easy prey to the propaganda of jehad. In fact, in Jammu and Kashmir it is a popular perception that getting into the rank and file of terrorism draws more money than getting into the all-elusive jobs. The government definitely should have looked at this angle too.
The call of the hour therefore is not to implement the amendment in haste. The issue should be looked in wider perspectives. The problems being faced by the weaker sections must be looked at with great care and in such a manner that it does not give rise to another problem in our society
The weaker sections of our society first need to be clearly defined and identified if the government's intent is to improve their lot and not to gain some hidden insane benefits only. Caste can no longer be taken as a basis for any such demarcation. No caste is weak or strong today, it's the position of an individual that is weaker or stronger. The lopsided reservation policy has only corroborated this. The people from the weaker sections must be at first ensured jobs at their own places. Their children must be ensured a healthy life and a healthy school education. Other embedded aspects are the population size and the growth rate of population among the weaker sections. The people sensitized to understand the relation between the size of population and the rate of population growth on one hand and jobs, poverty, health and effectiveness of governmental measures on the other. Let's hope the government would show enough courage and sense to provide the " governance with real human face".
